Who Do Politicians in the United States Represent: Rulers vs. Servants

Political representation in the United States is a deeply complex issue that can vary widely based on the individual and the electorate. Citizens elect officials to represent various levels of government, from local city council members to state senators and even the President. In reality, there are two main types of political ideologues among the individuals who enter politics: those who see themselves as Rulers and those who see themselves as Servants. Understanding these different views can help voters make more informed decisions.

The Ruler

The Ruler is someone who prioritizes their own interests above those of the electorate. These politicians often have a strong belief in their own capabilities and the ability to use their influence for personal gain or the perceived benefit of the nation. Supporters of Rulers often believe that these individuals are competent and can achieve important goals that will ultimately benefit society. For many, the moral shortcomings of the candidate do not matter as long as the ruler seems “kingly” and can lead effectively. The problem with this approach is that a ruler may not always have the electorate's best interests at heart, and after giving up control, voters mistakenly believe they are receiving what they desire from a powerful leader who has their interests at the forefront.

The Servant

In contrast, the Servant politician seeks to work in the best interests of their constituents. Supporters of Servants believe that these candidates will act with integrity and honor, striving to do the best job for them that they can. The expectation is that the servant will not only represent their interests but also work towards the greatest common good. Voters often hope that these leaders will be effective at facilitating compromise, especially when dealing with various conflicting interests. However, this approach can be fraught with challenges. Servants are expected to uphold high moral standards despite political and financial pressures that may contradict their personal beliefs and require compromise.

Bridging the Gap

The majority of politicians fall somewhere in between these extremes. They may strive to balance their personal interests with the needs and desires of their constituents. This middle-ground approach involves finding a delicate balance and is often difficult, especially in a politically charged environment.

Conclusion

Understanding the different political ideologies and the types of candidates can help voters make more informed choices. Whether a candidate is seen as a Ruler or a Servant fundamentally affects their approach to governance and the expectations voters have. By recognizing these differences, voters can better align their choices with their values and the goals they wish to see achieved in their communities and country.