Julius Erving vs. John Havlicek: Tough Choices in Basketball Greatness
Julius Erving and John Havlicek are two iconic names in basketball history. Both players left an indelible mark on the sport, but who was the better player during their prime? This article delves into their careers, highlighting the factors that contribute to their greatness and the challenges in comparing them.
The comparison: Julius Erving vs. John Havlicek
Both Julius Erving and John Havlicek were formidable figures during their respective careers. Erving's time with the ABA's New York Nets brought him two titles, while Havlicek played a critical role in the Boston Celtics' eight championship seasons. Erving is renowned for his athletic prowess and entertaining style on the court, whereas Havlicek is celebrated for his relentless work ethic and defensive skills. Both players were recognized for their contributions to the sport, but the question remains: who was the better player?
Erving's Strategic Versus Havlicek's All-Around Game
When assessing both players' all-around performances, it becomes clear that while they both excelled in different capacities, Havlicek edged out Erving in terms of consistent excellence throughout their careers. Havlicek was a 6th man who always gave his team his best effort. Whether playing second string or starting, his dedication to team success and his 100% commitment to the game every minute he was on the court cannot be overstated.
Leadership, Championship Titles, and Legacy
Julius Erving's contributions to basketball cannot be denied. He won the MVP award in the ABA, garnered multiple scoring titles, and played a key role in popularizing basketball, making him more recognizable than John Havlicek to many. However, John Havlicek's longevity and consistency in supporting his team's success through eight NBA championships make him a compelling case for the title of better all-around player.
Evaluation of Basketball Legends
Both Erving and Havlicek fit into the upper echelon of legendary basketball players. When including their careers in both the NBA and ABA, Julius Erving's achievements and impact in the ABA years make the comparison lean slightly in his favor. He not only won three consecutive ABA regular season MVPs and three scoring titles, but also won ABA titles during his prime years. This makes it easier to argue that Dr. J won the question comfortably when the ABA years are accounted for.
Personal Preferences and Player Personality
The debate between Erving and Havlicek is further complicated by the stark differences in their playing styles and personalities. Erving was synonymous with entertainment and style, while Havlicek was the consummate team player, always putting the team’s needs above his own. Personal preferences play a large role in which player fans of the sport support. For those who value team play and winning, John Havlicek is the clear choice. For those who prioritize individual performances and entertainment, Julius Erving stands out.
Conclusion
While there is no easy answer to the question of who was the better player between Julius Erving and John Havlicek, their legacies are undeniable. Both have left permanent marks on the history of basketball. Erring on the side of historic achievements, Dr. J wins the argument through a combination of his ABA MVPs, scoring titles, and overall impact on the sport. However, for those who place a premium on team play and championship success, Havlicek remains the unchallenged champion of team basketball.
Further Reading References
For more in-depth analyses of both Erving and Havlicek, please refer to the following links:
tNBA Top 50 Players of All Time tJulius Erving Player Profile: An Immortal Legend tRemembering the Best Little Man in NBA History: John Havlicek